In a gripping encounter at Lord’s, England batsman Jonny Bairstow found himself at the center of a bizarre run-out decision that left him fuming and the crowd chanting in protest. As England fought to chase down a challenging target of 371 runs on the final day, Bairstow fell victim to a peculiar sequence of events involving Australian wicket-keeper Alex Carey.
The incident occurred in the 52nd over when Bairstow opted to duck a delivery from Australia’s Cameron Green. Mistakenly believing the ball was dead and the over completed, Bairstow walked out of his crease. However, the vigilant Carey seized the opportunity and quickly underarmed the ball to dislodge the bails, leaving Bairstow in a state of bewilderment.
To Bairstow’s dismay, the umpire reviewed the footage and decided to dismiss him, ruling that the ball had remained active throughout the sequence. The 33-year-old batsman, who had scored 10 runs off 22 balls, reluctantly made his way back to the pavilion, marking England’s sixth wicket loss at a crucial juncture of the match. The Lord’s crowd, clearly displeased with the decision, vented their frustration by chanting “cheat, cheat” in unison.
Former England captain Eoin Morgan weighed in on the contentious incident, acknowledging the astute presence of mind displayed by Alex Carey. Morgan commended Carey’s quick thinking, stating, “Bairstow ducks, the ball is still active. He goes walking down the wicket and is out. It’s smart work by Carey.”
WATCH: Bairstow controversial dismissal in ASHES
The incident has sparked a flurry of reactions from former cricketers and pundits, with opinions divided over the legality and fairness of Carey’s actions. Some argue that it was a shrewd move within the laws of the game, highlighting the need for batsmen to remain vigilant until the ball is genuinely dead. Others criticize the decision, believing it to be against the spirit of the game and calling for greater sportsmanship.
As the match progresses, the run-out controversy has added an extra layer of tension between the teams. The incident serves as a reminder that cricket, despite its gentlemanly reputation, is not immune to contentious moments and heated debates. Only time will tell if this incident will have a lasting impact on the series or fade into the annals of cricketing controversies.